Crazy web sites

I’ve encountered a number of very weird web sites this week, not the good kind of weird either. Be careful if you visit them your IQ might plummet. 🙂 I’ve intentionally not linked the [crazy sites] because I don’t want to improve their search rankings. If any of the owners or supporters of the crazy sites wants my opinion, here it is, seek professional psychiatric help, sooner rather than later.

Barcodes are evil, as in Satan (echoing like the Church Ladies voice) – Warning: 666 Is Coming – [www.av1611.org/666.html] and [www.av1611.org/666/barcode.html].

These people think theocracy is good – Society for the Practical Establishment and Perpetuation of the TEN COMMANDMENTS – [www.tencommandments.org].

Too crazy to describe – 11:11 O’Clock Explained – [www.1111spiritguardians.com].

Wow they have an professional organization – the American Society of Dowsers – [www.dowsers.org], and a local chapter in my area – Greater Boston Chapter of ASD – [susantom.com].

On the way home from the office today I listened to this weeks The Infidel Guy Show a totally NOT crazy site and one of the fine “The Triad of Reason” podcasts. I’ve only been listening for a little while but so far I’ve liked the podcasts, in particular the Massimo Pigliucci interviews are excellent.

This weeks show is an interview with Glenn Borchardt [www.glennborchardt.com], Director (and possibly only member of) the Progressive Science Institute [www.scientificphilosophy.com]. Glenn has written a book, “THE SCIENTIFIC WORLDVIEW, Beyond Newton and Einstein: Understanding the Universal Mechanism of Evolution”, that he talks about on this weeks The Infidel Guy Show.

I can’t find words to describe the craziness but, I did find another blogger, Damian Guerra, who found the words: Glenn Borchardt and the Scientific Worldview and, The Scientific Worldview .

Capacitive voltage dividers and free energy

Recently on a circuit simulation mail list someone asked about simulating capacitive voltage dividers for a DC circuit. I couldn’t for the life of me think of why anyone would be attempting this. A number of list members responded and straightened the questioner out about capacitors and why not to use them for DC voltage division. After he was helped he thanked everyone and then pointed out what he was working on.

It would be hard to explain the circuit without a 20 page volume of concepts and math. But I will show it to you at Front Page (overunityenergy – Advanced Energy Technologies).

Now it makes sense, he was asking about a nonsense circuit. With a circuit this simple I can’t imagine it would take me 20 pages of concepts and math to fully describe its operation. I guess you would need 20 pages to make sure you have enough pseudoscience in there to fool people. Just check out this schematic from the home page:

[Update June, 2 2007] overunityenergy.pbwiki.com has been deleted but you can still see a version of the circuit here.

Ooh, they’ve been working on this for 12 22 years (1985-2007) thats determination. I love the Q=CV C=Q/V informational label, I guess if you work this long on these types of circuits you need a reminder of basic algebraic equation solving. Maybe the next revision will expand this to include the other form, V=Q/C, it should be a breakthrough for them. 😉 If you understand DC circuit theory you have to check out the “SFG 101 Course Of Study” for some good laughs. I’m not sure if the maintainers of the site are con-men or just pseudo-scientists with no real knowledge of physics (since they ask for money I’m leaning towards con-men).

A final note, while I was typing this up I suddenly heard a cuckoo clock sound from my PC. I hadn’t noticed the cuckoo clock on their website before, hmm, is this site a joke or are they [are] just too dense to notice the humor in having their page say cuckoo to visitors every hour.

[Update May 30, 2007] A couple of updates to this post. The person who posted to the LTSpice mail list is the owner and maintainer of the site, Dannie Ray Jackson. I misread the copyright dates on the picture of the schematic and noticed my error when Dan posted his Spice circuit to the LTSpice list. I think I just couldn’t comprehend how anyone could work on one simple circuit for 22 years without understanding what they are doing wrong. I had thought this was a young person who had started working on this at age eight and now at age twenty still hadn’t learned enough about electronic circuit design and basic physics to understand what he’s seeing, I was wrong.

Dan thinks he has some success because of the rigged spice schematic (it has multiple power sources). Other posters on the mail list have attempted to get him to see the error of his ways but alas I suspect he will just ignore them. In case Dan or anyone else reading this wants to understand what is really happening in this circuit I’ll give some hints. Although I haven’t seen Dan’s gathered data I suspect he has data showing that there is almost always an output voltage greater than the supplied voltage. However the amount of increase varies depending on many factors which he has not controlled for so he doesn’t have a clear indication of what is causing the phenomenon. I remember having similar results with circuits I played with 40 years ago when I was an 8 year old just starting to learn circuit design and analysis.

One key to understanding the potential sources of the extra power are in the common uses of diodes and capacitors in normal circuit designs. Diodes are very often, I hazard to say most often, used for rectification and demodulation, large value capacitors most often are used to store charge and filter AC signals to nearly a pure DC. The other thing to understand is that since the 20th century most places on earth have measurable electromagnetic fields originating from radio transmitters (intentional and unintentional) and AC power wires. This EMF is considered signs of ghosts by many ghost hunters and mysterious power sources by free energy seekers. The reality is that if you look at the spectrum with better instruments (e.g. oscilloscope, spectrum analyzer) instead of using simple detector circuits (e.g. EMF meter, home brew circuit) you’ll be able to actually identify the source.

All that is happening with the circuit from SFG Research is that the ambient EMF is being rectified by the diodes and stored in the capacitors. A simple way to prove this without expensive equipment is to mount the circuit in a well shielded enclosure. As long as you fully discharge the capacitors between tests, you’ll see that when the circuit is adequately shielded there is no increase in output over that provided by the battery. Keep in mind the increase in power when not shielded is very real it is just not all that useful as a power source. The power is useful in its RF form as it will allow you to hear a radio station without the need of external power (crystal radio set) and the low frequency form can be used to show the presence of live wires without actually contacting the circuit.

CAM, DCA and double standards.

There are an excellent set of blog posts by Orac and Dr. Novella today.

Dr. Novella’s post, The CAM Double Standard, causes me to fear for the future of health care in the U.S. I really hate that we taxpayers are shelling out money to anti-scientific research through the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. It sure seems to me that a lot of people want to take us back to the 19th century for our health care model. Read his article for the worrying details.

Orac posted “Clinical research” on dichloroacetate by TheDCASite.com: A travesty of science, it is his latest update on the, too long running, DCA is a miracle cure crap. I feel so badly for the patients and their loved ones who are grasping at straws with DCA sold through the BuyDCA website.

Reading through these posts and the linked pages I spotted a quote that can be an example for those trying to determine if something is bogus. A good way to spot bogus claims is to simply use a dictionary. The term I encountered is “aerobic oxygen”, without even looking in a dictionary I was pretty sure that adjective doesn’t go with that noun. Looking up aerobic on Webster’s site gives:

Main Entry: aer·o·bic
Pronunciation: “er-‘O-bik
Function: adjective
1 : living, active, or occurring only in the presence of oxygen

So the definition for the phrase “aerobic oxygen” is, oxygen that is active, or occurring only in the presence of oxygen. Clearly any thinking person will see that is ridiculous.

Over at Wikipedia they say:

Aerobic is an adjective that means “requiring air” (where “air” usually means oxygen).

This gives the phrase a definition of, oxygen requiring oxygen, or, oxygen requiring air. This is equally silly, perhaps the purveyors of “aerobic oxygen” mean something else but if they do they should really look up the correct adjective in a dictionary.

Nope, I just did a Google search for “aerobic oxygen” and the second two sites are clearly frauds looking to confuse prospective targets by mis-using the English language. The third result is an FDA notice from 2003 entitled “Cyber Warning Letter to Aerobic Oxygen USA”. Sadly, this FDA letter seems to be just a notice for them to change their site a little so that the fall under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act becoming exempt from FDA regulation.

BTW – the first site in the Google search gives a malware warning, thank you Google.

A great day for rational people and a bad day for the frauds

This is one of the most encouraging stories I’ve read in a while. Philadelphia PA is enforcing a law that was passed decades ago prohibiting fortune telling for profit. Far too many gullible people lose money they can’t really afford to these con-people. I think shutting them down is the right thing to do.

The AP story is here and a larger article from The Philadelphia Inquirer is here.

Now if only we can get this local law to become a federal law we can hit the frauds where they hurt, their wallets.

How to spot pseudo-technology

The Swiss Institute for Applied Environmental Technology (UMTEC) has published a great “checklist for identifying dubious technologies“. Following the advice given in the document can help you avoid wasting money on the many fraudulent miracle inventions out there. They also have a number of other publications available for download although most are not in english.

Tip of the hat to James Randi for pointing this out in his newsletter a couple weeks ago.

William Dembski shows his lack of intelligence

Richard Dawkins had his 66th Birthday earlier this week (March 26, a belated Happy Bday). The people running his site invited readers to wish him a happy birthday and thousands did.

William Dembski, a Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture sent a mean spirited message to Dawkins and then posted this rant on Uncommon Descent:

“For whatever reason, the people at richarddawkins.net put me on their mailing list and sent me an invitation some time back to write a birthday greeting for Richard Dawkins, who celebrates his 66th birthday today. Go to richarddawkins.net/happybirthdayRD, and you’ll find birthday greetings from Dan Dennett, Sam Harris, P.Z. Myers, Michael Shermer, etc. But my birthday greeting is nowhere to be found.”

Dembski is asserting that his birthday message wasn’t posted but of course it was posted, see if you can find it in the full list of messages. I’d heard that they never allow critical posts over at the Uncommon Descent blog but since I didn’t have first hand evidence of it I decided to post a comment to the blog. I submitted the following comment on the 27th:

Wow, you can’t find your name in the list sorted by name! That says a lot about you.

Well now I have first hand evidence, they wouldn’t post my comment. This is exactly the opposite of all the other blogs I regularly read, they all tend to let visitors get way past criticism and to the obvious troll stage before they ban a comment. I had hoped he might at least post an apology for accusing others of censorship without checking his facts but alas it seems he has no honor. Frankly how can anyone believe a word out of the mouth of someone so lacking in intelligence they can’t find their own name on an alphabetic list and so lacking in honor they won’t admit a mistake.

The more I read the writings of the other ID proponents it is becoming clear that all of them are being intellectually dishonest. They are simply looking for a way to force either religious teaching or intellectual laziness into the science curriculum of U.S. public schools. Fortunately for The U.S.A., science teachers and scientists aren’t standing for this and the courts have so far seen through their scam.

The latest high profile ID proponent is Dr. Michael Egnor who like the others simply ignores or criticizes a century of building evidence and, offers no evidence to support his claims that some supernatural force is the real cause for evolution.

Dr. Steven Novella wrote a good post on Michael Egnor at the NeuroLogica Blog a couple weeks ago, check it out. Last week, Coturnix at A Blog Around The Clock put together a good list of links to blog posts that cover Egnor and provide more answers to the questions Egnor raises. I’ve reproduced the list here for your convenience.

Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor

WD-40 Myths

I received an email with the subject of “WD-40 IT WORKS!” the other day. Anytime I see an all capitals subject line I know I’m in for a bit of craziness. 🙂 I love WD-40 but, it is a chemical that should not be treated as lightly as it seems many people do.

The not so good information in the email seems to be posted at many places on the web including:

Snopes has a version of the email that is very similar to the one I received. They took the time to ask the WD-40 makers for their thoughts about the list and received a revised list with many items removed. This is very good as some of the suggestions for usage in the email contradict the companies usage instructions and are potentially dangerous. The WD-40 company publishes a “List of 2000 Uses” containing the following caution, which is also on their web site.

The uses of WD-40 described on this website were provided to WD-40 Company by end-users of the product, and do not constitute recommendations or suggestions for use of WD-40 by WD-40 Company. These uses have not been tested by WD-40 Company. Consumers should exercise common sense whenever using WD-40. Always follow the instructions and take heed of any warnings printed on the WD-40 packaging.

This caution statement should help keep the WD-40 Co. safe from law suits arising from using WD-40 in dangerous ways. However I feel that rather than just slap up a legal disclaimer they should really have a list of things not to do with WD-40.

Lets take a look at some of the badly wrong statements from the email. The first one that is very misleading is this sentence. “Ken East (one of the original founders) says there is nothing in WD-40 that would hurt you.” According to the 2003 WD-40 Company Annual Report:

The name WD-40 stands for Water Displacement on the Fortieth Try. That is the
name straight out of the lab book that was used by the chemist who discovered the
compound back in 1953. Norm Larsen was attempting to concoct a formula that could
prevent rust and corrosion  a task that is accomplished by displacing water. Norm’s
persistence paid off when he perfected the formula on his fortieth try.

… the product is still mixed at the corporate headquarters in San Diego by a single brewmaster. His name is Ken East, and he has been with the Company for 9 years.

So Ken East is not “one of the original founders” and didn’t even start working there until 1994, 41 years after WD-40 was created. Considering the ingredients list shown in the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) I doubt very much a sane person would say “there is nothing in WD-40 that would hurt you.” I’m just guessing but, I bet Ken East wears protective gear when he handles the ingredients.

The MSDS shows that its main ingredients are all petroleum distillates:

Aliphatic Petroleum Distillates
Petroleum Base Oil
LVP Hydrocarbon Fluid

This clearly shows the following statement from the email to be completely false.

P. S. The basic ingredient is FISH OIL.

This is an urban legend that is completely false, Like all man made petroleum products there are health affects from exposure and WD-40 ranks a 2 on a scale of 0 to 4 for health hazard on the MSDS. Also from the MSDS health hazard section comes these cautions and first aid instructions.

Symptoms of Overexposure
Inhalation (Breathing): May cause anesthesia, headache, dizziness, nausea and upper respiratory irritation.
Skin contact: May cause drying of skin and/or irritation.
Eye contact: May cause irritation, tearing and redness.
Ingestion (Swallowed): May caused irritation, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.
First Aid Emergency Procedures
Ingestion (Swallowed): Do not induce vomiting, seek medical attention.
Eye Contact: Immediately flush eyes with large amounts of water for 15 minutes.
Skin Contact: Wash with soap and water.
Inhalation (Breathing): Remove to fresh air. Give artificial respiration if necessary. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen.
Pre-existing medical conditions such as eye, skin and respiratory disorders may be aggravated by exposure.
DANGER!
Aspiration Hazard: If swallowed, can enter lungs and may cause chemical pneumonitis. Do not induce vomiting. Call Physician immediately.

To someone not familiar with MSDS sheets this may look very bad. However by MSDS standards this is a mid-range hazardous substance. If, like me, you aren’t too worried about health problems from things like air pollution, second hand smoke, mercury from thermometers or lead from electronics then WD-40 is not a huge problem, you just simply need to be cautious and follow the instructions on the can.

In addition to not being a good idea to eat, breathe or cover yourself with WD-40, an often overlooked danger is the flammability. Looking again at the MSDS we see that WD-40 has a flash point of 131°F making it rather flammable which is one reason why the company issues this Special Precaution in the MSDS:

Keep from sources of ignition. Avoid excessive inhalation of spray particles, do not take internally. Do not puncture, incinerate or store container above 120°F. Exposure to heat may cause bursting . Keep can away from electrical current or battery terminals. Electrical arcing can cause burn-through (puncture) which may result in flash fire, causing serious injury. Keep from children.

Here are some of the bad and potentially dangerous uses from the email along with my comments why I think they are bad.

3) Cleans and lubricates guitar strings.

Who wants slippery guitar strings?

4) Gives floors that ‘just-waxed’ sheen without making it slippery.

You’ve got to be kidding me, a lubricant that makes almost anything slippery some how magically doesn’t make floors slippery.

5) Keeps flies off cows.

While it may keep the flies off, petroleum distillates aren’t good for the cow’s health and might hurt the flavor of the food products made from the cow.

6) Restores and cleans chalkboards.

I once accidentally got some on a slate board, it left a shiny surface that had to be cleaned with a solvent before the chalk worked well again.

7) Removes lipstick stains.

It might remove the lipstick but depending on the fabric it may leave its own stain or damage the fabric.

10) Removes stains from stainless steel sinks.

As long as you never intend to put food or cooking utensils in the sink it might work. Myself I find that steel wool does the best job of cleaning stainless steel sinks without any chemicals needed. The next bunch are all bad ideas for one or more of the reasons given already, (slippery, stains some materials, bad to eat, bad to breathe, bad to get on skin, flammable).

11) Removes dirt and grime from the barbecue grill.
13) Removes tomato stains from clothing.
14) Keeps glass shower doors free of water spots.
15) Camouflages scratches in ceramic and marble floors.
20) Gives a children’s play gym slide a shine for a super fast slide.
25) Restores and cleans padded leather dashboards in vehicles, as well as vinyl bumpers.
29) Lubricates fan belts on washers and dryers and keeps them running smoothly.
31) Removes splattered grease on stove.
32) Keeps bathroom mirror from fogging.
36) Folks even spray it on their arms, hands, and knees to relieve arthritis pain.
38) The favorite use in the state of New York WD-40 protects the Statue of Liberty from the elements.
39) WD-40 attracts fish. Spray a LITTLE on live bait or lures and you will be catching the big one in no time. Also, it’s a lot cheaper than the chemical attractants that are made for just that purpose. Keep in mind though, using some chemical laced baits or lures for fishing are not allowed in some states.
40) Use it for fire ant bites. It takes the sting away immediately and stops the itch.
41) WD-40 is great for removing crayon from walls Spray on the mark and wipe with a clean rag.
42) Also, if you’ve discovered that your teenage daughter has washed and dried a tube of lipstick with a load of laundry, saturate the lipstick spots with WD-40 and re-wash. Presto! Lipstick is gone!

P. P. S. I keep a can of WD-40 in my kitchen cabinet over the stove. It is good for oven burns or any other type of burn. It takes the burned feeling away and heals with NO scarring.

This last one is really bright, keep a can of a rather flammable substance right by the stove and then spray it on your skin. If you’ve got an electric stove you’ll probably get away with this but if you’ve got a nice open gas flame you could be in for a hot surprise. If you’re one of those people who likes to put grease on burns try something a bit less likely to catch fire like petroleum jelly or butter. Frankly I still follow the burn advice I was taught by paramedics in my Boy Scout first aid course, ice to stop the pain and if a blister pops then use a clean bandage and antibiotic ointment to prevent infection (for 3rd degree burns see a Doctor, no exceptions).

I love WD-40 but it is a chemical that should not be treated as lightly as many people do. Respect chemicals and they can help you greatly, misuse them and you may regret it.

When you need some stats, get em here

The next time you need some authoritative looking statistics to back up your arguments visit eSolutionsData.

eSolutionsData relies on people not reading the fine-print to get away with showing seemingly authoritative, yet totally “customized” statistics. Impress everyone in the meeting by proving your point not only makes common sense, but is also backed up by a statistic printed from a real website.

Using their technique you can create convincing looking statistics that sadly I think many people will believe.